Bow net relationship testing system

1.1 Product Overview

The pantograph catenary relationship testing system accurately simulates the longitudinal, transverse, and vertical loads and movements of the pantograph, and simulates the working status of the pantograph and overhead line. Product development and design engineers can study the dynamic relationship between the pantograph, overhead line, and overhead line. The entire system has * accuracy and repeatability, and can achieve different testing tasks and goals.

1.2 Product Advantages and Technical Features

1.2.1 Wide range of applications

By replaying the time history of road surface data collection, various real working conditions can be reproduced.

1.2.2 Cost effectiveness

Realize bow net relationship testing in a controllable and reproducible laboratory environment, without the need for real vehicles and tracks.

1.2.3 Accurate/reproducible

High precision measurement sensors enable the measurement of small performance differences in the measured object.

1.2.4. Accelerate the experiment

Implement dynamic testing of bow net relationships and combine mHIL testing technology to quickly conduct in-depth research.

Performance indicators and components of the bow net relationship testing system

System performance

System control channel

Overhead lines: vertical displacement;

Lateral movement (zigzag);

Speed of overhead power lines;

Vertical movement of pantograph;

Lifting and lowering of pantograph;

Voltage;

Air-cooled cooling;

Transportation method: Whole machine transportation

Acceptance criteria and third-party verification

1. Acceptance criteria: The technical indicators shall be in accordance with the methods specified in the "Technical Agreement" B/T5170-1995 standard signed by both parties.

2. Acceptance method: Formal acceptance shall be conducted on the site of the purchaser.

3. If the purchaser needs to invite a third party (verified by the National Environmental Testing Equipment Quality Inspection Center and issued a valid inspection report) to participate in the acceptance before leaving the factory, the cost shall be borne by the purchaser. If the first acceptance is not qualified, the cost incurred during the second acceptance after improvement by the supplier shall be borne by the supplier.

4. The customer entrusts the National Environmental Testing Equipment Quality Inspection Center to conduct calibration on their own.